![]() At a fraction of the price, it offered virtually the same functionality as Trados. ![]() It amazed me that what looked basically like a glorified MS Word macro could kick the pants off a behemoth like Trados. Part of the attraction (for me) of the scrappy underdog that WF was back then was how cheap and flimsy it looked. Later on, it started to charge for licenses, but they were still far cheaper than the hundreds charged by Trados for a tool that, frankly, semed stuck in the 1990s. Back then, it generated a lot of buzz by providing very similar capabilities to Trados for free. It is not an easy step to take, because I had been a fan of the tool ever since it came out in the early naughties. OK, two more projects with Wordfast Pro and I am even closer to throwing in the towel. Time to return to the tried and true Classic version of a beloved product?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |